Call it ‘The Drone Collector’.
Call it ‘The Drone Collector’.
As of today, Operation Protective Edge has been going on for almost four weeks. There doesn’t seem to be a clear end in sight at the moment. Here’s some thoughts on what it looks like to me.
While Israel is probably justified in responding to attacks from Hamas, the entire thing is completely stupid.
Well, you can’t bomb Hamas out of existence. It’s just not going to happen.
Why does Hamas exist in the first place? Well, I don’t claim to be an expert on the Middle East. But there are several problems here. First, unemployment is around 30%. That is not to say that unemployment is the root of all the problems; and in fact may not be, as crime does not necessarily go up when unemployment goes up. In addition to just the unemployment, the population in Gaza is very young. If the Freakonomics guys are to believed, that is the root of the problem here. Essentially, people have no future, so they turn to the one organization that can give them something: Hamas.
Now, back to the central question: Why can’t we just bomb Hamas out of existence? Well a few reasons.
The dangerous man is the one who has only one idea, because then he’ll fight and die for it.
I don’t know if the above quote is actually from Crick, but I have seen it attributed to him. This is the main problem with Hamas – they have an idea, and people turn to them because they feel that there’s no hope(my thoughts, I don’t know if that’s actually true).
So, what has to happen?
If you want to defeat Hamas, you need to weaken them(duh). To do that, you need to reform them. That simply isn’t going to happen while bombs are still dropping; it creates a lot of resentment. A large investment in Gaza and the West Bank is what has to happen in order for people to have jobs and turn against Hamas. After all, Hamas was first elected because the people in Gaza thought that they would be able to give them a better life – since that hasn’t happened, people have begun to turn against Hamas. Since the sentiment is generally against Hamas, now is the time to come in and invest properly.
I don’t have a magic pill that will solve everything. But there are things that should be done to make this a better world. Even if there aren’t any formal peace negotiations, both sides should still talk to each other. After all, what my uncle says is true:
You’re not going to solve any problems if you don’t talk to each other.
Not talking to other people means that you don’t go anywhere. If you’re talking, you can at least get somewhere.
So, apparently my website was hacked.
It doesn’t look like a WordPress vulnerability(although I can’t say for sure). Anybody know where any logs are kept?
Of course, passwords have been changed to 15+ characters in length, so that should keep any passwords from being hacked easily.
How did Gravity get so many awards? I didn’t think that it was a very good movie.
I mean, sure it was nicely made. It had good effects. But it was an hour and a half of Sandra Bullock breathing heavily and being incompetent. I just don’t see it. To some extent, a lot of people would freak out; on the other hand, you’re supposed to be a professional.
Today, I had to compile a custom kernel driver for Ubuntu, and it took me quite a while to do. There are a lot of guides out there, but many of them don’t seem to show the right way, or they do it one very specific way. Fortunately, thanks to this person, I’ve figured out an easy way to do this which doesn’t involve re-compiling the entire kernel.
I just re-watched Transporter 2, and I came up with the best idea ever for an action movie. Well, technically I came up with it a few days or weeks ago, but now seems like a good time to post.
What if we took Vin Diesel and Jason Statham and put them in a movie together? It’d be two hours of beating other people up.
After all, most of their movies seem to follow the same basic plot. Guy goes on a mission/people are coming to get him. He beats them up. End of story. I’m looking at you, Riddick and Transporter.
If we want to throw in more bald people in there, throw Bruce Willis in as well. That would be a great trio right there.
Of course, I have a feeling that the movie would have no plot. But then again, you have three guys beating up other guys, so what plot needs to be there? 😛
So I had a funny dream last night.
For some reason, I was thinking of the song Tubthumping by Chumawamba(a.k.a. I get Knocked Down). This morning, shortly I woke up, I had a dream about part of the song. Only some of the lyrics were replaced. The best way to describe it is when the woman sings “Pissing the night away / pissing the night away” I replaced the lyrics with “I believe in the darkness / I believe in the light”. Only a little happier. And it was also sung by a woman with long pink hair in WWII-era uniform. She was in the bar from Band of Brothers next to Carwood Lipton.
This brings up a good question: what do we dream? Do we have full lifetimes in our dreams? There is one person that I can remember(though sadly I can’t remember who at this point) who had a years-long dream and was in the middle of writing it down when he was interrupted. Can we all have dreams like this? It reminds me of the Batman Beyond episode where people were addicted to a virtual reality simulation.
Anyway, that’s the random thought of the day.
Last night, I went to see The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug, and it got me thinking about the CGI that was used. Not just in The Hobbit, but in the previews as well. There was a preview for The Amazing Spiderman 2, and almost the entire trailer was CGI clips. Now don’t get me wrong, CGI can be used to do some great shots. However, the problem as I see it is that it can be greatly over-used.
On some movies, this can be an intentional choice. Such as in Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow, where pretty much the entire movie was CGI – this works in my opinion. However, when you need to mix CGI and live-action seamlessly, there can be a tendency more to be lazy with the live-action. Before CGI, miniatures had to be made for everything, and miniatures almost always look better than CGI. Granted, these shots probably used CGI to cut two shots together, but in my mind this is an acceptable use of CGI. Creating an entire scene seems lazy.
The reason that I found The Hobbit to have a lot of CGI is because most of the movie that was inside the lonely mountain was CGI. Everything just seemed too perfect. The gold coins seemed all flat, Smaug was sitting on a ridiculously large pile of gold, among other things. I will paraphrase The Hobbit book here, from memory:
A constant stream of smoke came out of the gate.
I never got this feeling from the movie; everything still seemed as though the dwarves had left the lonely mountain and nothing had really changed.
To conclude, I think that this video shows what I’m talking about well; there are CGI elements, but it’s used more to tie two real shots together. Because of this, it really shows better what is going on, and everything seems more realistic. One of the problems with CGI as I see it is that everything seems too perfect; this is partly because of how the light is reflecting off of objects. Most of the time, everything seems too bright. The rest of the time, it generally feels off because the laws of physics seem to be broken; miniatures still have to follow the laws of physics.
You guys used to be so good. You had a bunch of interesting shows that really let me learn a lot about the world. And now you do crap like mermaids, and now megalodon shark attacks on boats in South Africa. WHAT THE FUCK?! Look, I’m all for being entertained, but when I’m watching Discovery, Animal Planet, heck any channel that is owned by Discovery, I’m not looking for entertainment. I’m looking to learn.
I think that these shows do have a place in the world. But when you make shows like these, don’t film them as pseudo-documentaries, or “mockumentaries” as people call them. They should be about possible things that happen. You guys should be there to help promote thinking about what is there, and what used to be there. None of this fake crap that you’re putting out there now – it’s frankly insulting.
I know that you guys make enough money as it is. This is just retarded that you’re doing something like this. If you want to do something about megalodon, that’s fine. Let’s do it in a way that lets people learn about megalodon, like what it could have been like. Also, I don’t want actors playing biologists or anything, get real biologists out there to tell us this stuff. You do a great disservice to all of us when there are people pretending to be biologists when they really aren’t.
Also, History Channel, I’m looking at you too. I don’t really have anything against Pawn Stars or American Pickers, because they can be good shows about showing off items from history. But when I hear crap like Pawn Stars having an item on the show that is in a museum currently, well, that’s just stupid as well. Again, not that there’s anything wrong with the show itself per se, but when it’s blatantly obvious that they’re not actually buying or selling anything then we have a bit of an issue here.
TruTV, you’re not so good yourself. I don’t really watch you anymore. Except for maybe World’s Dumbest. That’s actually amusing since it’s not really staged, it’s just people making sarcastic comments and mocking dumb people.