Time continues marching on, which is kinda what time does.
Anyway, happy new year!
Time continues marching on, which is kinda what time does.
Anyway, happy new year!
A few weeks ago, I came across this comment on Reddit about Law Abiding Citizen, and how some people think that the ending was bad. So I would just like to say that first of all, I do like the ending as it stands(see the parent comment). It fits with the movie, especially since earlier in the movie Clyde explicitly told Nick that his objective wasn’t to kill him, it was to teach him a lesson. It’s a bit hard to teach somebody a lesson if they are dead!
However, the two alternative endings are interesting, so here are some thoughts on how those might play out:
The same ending happens, but during the meeting with the city officials the Mayor basically sanctions higher ups to stop Shelton by any means necessary because of how politically damaging it is becoming. She basically gives the go ahead to have them kill him and make it look like an accident, but unbeknownst to them the same feed Shelton was watching in prison is being live-streamed to media new outlets around the world, thereby showing the world that the people that swore to uphold justice will wilfully abandon their morals to save themselves, thus “bring the whole fuckin’ diseased, corrupt temple down…”.
This would be kinda cool, in a revenge sort of way, to perhaps show that corruption goes all the way up. But I don’t really see how this could be a good ending with teaching Nick a lesson – I think it would have to end with the feed going out, but the bomb still going off, to show that once you break the rules there are consequences.
The original ending plays out the same, except at the end Foxx is sitting at his daughters recital pleased as punch that he beat Butler, even though it was by straight up
murdering himletting him die, and his tie suddenly tightens and chokes him to death (the same method that was foreshadowed by the CIA agent earlier in the film). Clyde still dies, but Foxx learns that even the DA is not exempt from ‘action without consequence’ so it’s a little easier to swallow.
So what would also make this very cool would be to have an ending similar to Inception. You don’t show the actual act, you have the tie start to visibly tighten and then show Nick’s hand going up to his neck to play with the tie – and then cut out. Again though, I don’t think that this fits with the theme of teaching Nick a lesson, since it’s hard to teach him a lesson if he’s dead. It would be a cool ending though.
Barbara Bush died a few days ago, and The Onion had this to say about it:
Barbara Bush Passes Away Surrounded By Loved Ones, Jeb
This got me thinking a bit, how can we change the meaning of this sentence just by making some very minor edits to it? As it stands right no, the comma at the end of the headline make two different groups, Barbara Bush’s loved ones and Jeb. These groups are separate, and the headline would be the same if the comma was replaced with an ampersand(&). What happens if we change the comma to a colon though?
Barbara Bush Passes Away Surrounded By Loved Ones: Jeb
As a headline in this case, this is saying that Jeb stated Barbara passed away. There’s no relationship between Jeb and her loved ones. Now what would happen if we add more people to the end?
Barbara Bush Passes Away Surrounded By Loved Ones: Jeb, George
By having more than one person here, we are now defining who the loved ones are of Barbara. At least that’s what first comes to mind for me.
Anyway, I just thought that this was interesting. And quite possibly confusing to people who are just learning English, as the punctuation makes a big difference in this case.
Today, I created an APT repo for my projects. At the moment, this hosts only CSerial, however the intention is to put some other projects up at some point. Note that because CSerial is built as both amd64 and armhf in the same repository, you may need to give the exact version to APT when installing: apt-get install cserial-dev=version
Versions can be seen by using the following APT command: apt-cache policy cserial-dev
There are actually two APT repos: one for nightly builds, and one for the releases. As of right now, nothing is in the releases, as I need to fix a few bugs before that happens.
Everything in these APT repos is built from Jenkins.
The main website can be seen here: http://apt.rm5248.com/
As you may have heard recently, Juicero is shutting down. While not entirely unexpected, their business model just seemed insane to start with. As recounted in some of the Slashdot comments, Juicero went through $100+ million dollars in funding.
This brings up an obvious question:
HOW DO YOU SPEND THIS MUCH MONEY?
Really. Over 100 million dollars to create a device that does nothing but squeeze juice? Give me only ten million and I will fail faster for you! I’m not quite sure what these guys were doing with all that money(although AvE’s video seems enlightening), but I’m beginning to think that they were simply trying to go too far at once. Instead of making a small, feasible product at first, they went and sunk a whole lot of money into design and not a whole lot into making an actually reasonable device. This is just insane the amount of money spent on this.
From the VC point of view, probably what they were thinking is “continuous revenue stream”, which would be reasonable from their view of getting money back. While the premise may have good, the actual execution was very lacking. After all, “aim for the stars, hope not to get the exact polar opposite of what you were actually trying to accomplish.”
So I saw Rogue One last week, and I found it to be quite interesting. It wasn’t my favorite movie, but it was a good lead in to A New Hope. Once I got back home, I had to look up the crawl for A New Hope, which of course I did on TV tropes. Looking at the TV tropes page for A New Hope, there is this one section that I feel is somewhat out of place:
- Admiral Motti’s description of the Force as a “sad devotion to that ancient religion” seems downright bizarre, given that its existence was treated as common knowledge in the Prequel Trilogy, a timeframe in which Motti would likely have been alive (albeit very young). This is largely because when the film was written Lucas envisioned exact knowledge of the Force and Jedi powers to be something which only a select few had knowledge of, which was gradually contradicted by the Expanded Universe novels and comics, and then jettisoned altogether by The Phantom Menace. Some later novels, such as the Republic Commando novels, took some steps to try and square the two perspectives, but with limited success.
The “sad devotion to that ancient religion” actually seems like it could be a plausible thing for him to say, even though the bullet point goes on to say that this was contradicted with later works. Why would this work? Well, let’s do some basic math here and get some rough estimates of how many people there are.
First order of business: How many Jedi are there? The movies don’t say for certain, but the Jedi temple seems to be quite large. Making grand assumptions here, let’s also assume that it is large enough to fit every Jedi at once in it. Given that it seems to encompass an entire city block at least, let us say that the Jedi temple can fit 100,000 people. (According to scifi.stackexchange.com, there were about 10,000 Jedi at the time of Order 66). Regardless, 10,000 vs 100,000 Jedi will make no difference here in a moment.
Next question: How large is Coruscant? Assuming that it is the same size as Earth, and has a population density at least as high as the highest city on Earth(according to Wikipedia, that is Manila at 41,515 people/km²). According to Wolfram|Alpha, the Earth is 5.1×10^8 square kilometers. Now, multiplying these two numbers together we get a population of ~2.1×10^13. According to Wookieepedia, there is more than 1 trillion(1×10^12) people on Coruscant. If I am doing the math correctly here, my estimate for the number of people on Coruscant is (one order of magnitude * 2 ) from what Wookiepedia says.
Now that we have our numbers(both unofficial and estimated), let’s do some quick math here to figure out about how many Jedi there are per-person on Coruscant.
|Number of Jedi||Population of Coruscant||People-per-Jedi|
Now, obviously these numbers are rather rough estimates. But at a minimum, there are ten million people on Coruscant per Jedi!
Now, back to the original question: Why is the statement “sad devotion to that ancient religion” completely plausible in my mind? Because given the ratio of people to Jedi on Coruscant alone, it is likely that you could go an entire lifetime without seeing a real Jedi. Don’t forget as well, there are more planets than just Coruscant. Basically, the number of Jedi for the population of the galaxy is laughably small. If you combine the lack of population with potentially a good PR campaign, it is completely plausible that a person could grow up in the galaxy and never see a Jedi, only hear about them, and then be convinced that Jedi are bad people who were controlling the fate of the galaxy in their hands and/or they were just pretending. Reportedly, there was a minister in Pakistan who fooled the entire government for 6 years that he wasn’t an actual minister(note: I can’t find any other sources to this from Western media, so I don’t know the veracity of this).
So, to conclude: It is reasonable to assume that because there were so few Jedi for the entire population of the galaxy, any effort to discredit them could be very effective at wiping their knowledge from the population’s memory.
An update to my previous problem with checking into SVN. I had the same problem just now:
$ svn commit -m "message" Sending debian/control Transmitting file data . Committed revision 9488. Warning: post commit FS processing had error: sqlite[S5]: database is locked
I SSH’d into the server to try and figure out the problem. I then stumbled across this post on the SVN mailing list. Checking the rep-cache.db, it has two commits less than what the current revision number is, which would match up with my two failed commits, so that seemed suspicious. I then figured out if some process had the rep-cache.db open at all:
$ lsof | grep rep-cache
As it turns out, Atlassian Fisheye had a bunch of connections open to this database for some reason. I restarted Fisheye to kill all those connections, so we will see if that fixes the problem. Note that this is also running an old version of Fisheye(3.2.3), so it could be a problem with just this version.
Have you ever had to debug a Qt program running on a different computer? There are a few special things that you must do in Qt Creator in order to properly get all of the debug information out from the device.
In my case, I’m debugging a Qt program running on an ARM processor, while debugging through my x86 computer.
First of all, you will need a root filesystem on your local computer that matches what is installed on your board. See my guide on cross-compling Qt for ARM for information on how to use qemu-debootstrap to create a new rootfilesystem. Alternatively, this should also work with any other filesystem that you create(e.g. through yocto).
Now that you have your root filesystem, here’s how to setup Qt Creator correctly:
$ apt-get source qt5-default
set sysroot /path/to/rootfs set debug-file-directory /path/to/rootfs/usr/lib/debug
$ sudo chroot /path/to/rootfs # apt-get install qtbase5-dbg
You should now have a fully functioning remote debugging system.
I’d like to take a moment to talk to you today about sequel escalation. In general, this is when the next movie in a series has an even worse bad guy than the previous one.
(This is not limited to only movies though)
I was thinking about this as I watched the Fast and Furious franchise, although this also happens in the new Bond films. I know that it is in someways inevitable; after all, if the new bad guy was easier to defeat, that would make for a bit of a dull movie, right? But that is in some ways the problem. There can only be so many international terrorists and criminal masterminds. Once you get rid of one of them, a new one does not magically appear.
There has to be some kind of limit here.
But that never seems to happen.
Anyway, just some random thoughts.
I don’t know anything about hacking. It’s true.
I know the basic theory behind some of the attacks, but in-depth knowledge is beyond me. I went to school for almost five years to learn how to program, and I can’t even tell you how to hack into a computer.
I like to think that the software that I write is immune to being hacked, but I don’t know for sure without having somebody else look for vulnerabilities. At this point, if I were to try to hack something, I would be a script kiddie. And that’s not something that you want to be.